Hazel Grove Forum

A Suburb in Stockport

10 10 / 10 from 9 Reviews

Post Reply

You are posting as a Guest

You are not logged into an account. There are many benefits to registering an account with us, such as the ability to edit your posts.

Register Login.

Items marked with an astrix (*) must be filled in



 


 

Format Codes Disabled | Smileys Disabled

 

 

Code Image - Please contact webmaster if you have problems seeing this image code  Refresh Refresh Image
Powered by Web Wiz CAPTCHA version 4.03
Copyright ©2005-2013 Web Wiz
 

By clicking submit you agree this complies with our Standards.



stukaville posted..

[QUOTE=Artie_Fufkin]

I can't see why it matters, your father got the treatment and if the NHS can outsource the work and get more for less, then all the better. If another company can create a more efficient solution than the NHS can, surely that's good?

I don;t think thee needs to be an ideological need to have an NHS only service if the service is going to be more expensive or not as good.[/QUOTE]

You can't see why it matters because your basing your view on unfounded assumptions. You are assuming the NHS is automatically getting more for less. Usually you tend to get less for less but I'll be logical here and assume the NHS is getting the same, for alot more. Hear is my logic. The doctor my father saw in Stepping Hill said that the test used to be done at Stepping Hill. He used to carry the the test out. All he would need to keep on doing this test is the equipment that he must of had originally. Based on what I have seen, I would say that in a good deal of cases contracts are being formed with private healthcare providers for 'ideological' reasons. That is being a tad kind at best. It wouldn't suprise me if some of these contracts were more about who was mates with who, who owns shares in what etc.